Author
|
Topic: Junkyard Single/ Twin Turbo FAQ List (Read 102952 times)
|
artic
T28
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 55
Location:
0
|
i used to do some searching around truck junkyards but didn't learn a ton....i was looking for a to4 for my 2.3L for cheap.
i guess i'm starting to wonder if the best way to look for a diesel turbo is to look at factory hp rating at cetain RPM's and their displacement. realizing that hp is a funtion of tq and rpm, along with displacement i think with a little thought and some real world test you could come up with some good rules of thumb for determing what trucks would be the best donars.
like for example( i don't know if this mathematically works) if a turbo can support 300hp@3000rpms on a 600ci diesel, then would that same turbo be able to support 600hp@6000rpms on a 300ci motor?
if anyone knows maybe we can make this work to our atvantage, or if someone knows which turbos/sizes came on certain model years/engines/trucks we can firgure out a list.
i've been trying to figure out which are best for different applications from rotories to big blocks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boost Engineer
|
Diesel applications AND Marine applications typically rate the hp at 1/2 of the actual hp capability.
This means that your 300 hp boat engine could run forever at 300 hp with great durability.
If you check out the airflow calculation that ONE LB of AIR will make 10 HP on gasoline (if you have the right air/fuel ratios) then a compressor that flows 30 lb per minute should make 300 hp.
The same 300 hp diesel turbo might actually be a 60 lb/ min unit that could make 600 hp on gas.
So lets say that you do have this 600 hp/ 60 lb/min turbo. In reality it takes one hp to move ONE LB of air so your turbo actually would only make 540 hp.
With a belt driven compressor you would typically add another 20% mechanical losses due to the bearings/ gears/ belt losses, etc. so a belt car would make around 528 hp for the same 60 lb/ min of air.
Hope this helps.
Tom V.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Silverback
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1287
Location: DC Metro
|
What the hell are you talking about? Originally posted by Boost Engineer Diesel applications AND Marine applications typically rate the hp at 1/2 of the actual hp capability. [/b] No, they’re rated for their output. Typically they’re built more substantially because they will typically run at or near their max hp level all day… OTOH, the issues that arise from acceleration/deceleration and high rpms are a non issue with diesel applications, so they do not have to be built to withstand them. Turbos on diesel applications tend to run larger because of differences of how air is used in the combustion process and because of the fewer changes in rpm, so that you don’t have to worry about spooling as much and can run a larger, more efficient turbo. As emissions regs start to effect diesels the turbo sizing is starting to get closer to what would be used on a gas engine. Marine applications size the turbos very similarly to normal, road going gas applications with the exception that again, you don’t have to worry as much about how fast it will spool so you can use a slightly larger, more efficient turbo. The same 300 hp diesel turbo might actually be a 60 lb/ min unit that could make 600 hp on gas.
So lets say that you do have this 600 hp/ 60 lb/min turbo. In reality it takes one hp to move ONE LB of air so your turbo actually would only make 540 hp. [/b] ¿Que? Wha ‘u talking about willis? No supercharger actually makes power. Period. I can’t even figure out how that statement could make sense. With a belt driven compressor you would typically add another 20% mechanical losses due to the bearings/ gears/ belt losses, etc. so a belt car would make around 528 hp for the same 60 lb/ min of air. [/b] It’s rarely so nice and clean. Typically a belt driven supercharger will draw a specific amount of power to when turned at a specific RPM and pressure ratio. That doesn’t mean that the engine makes less, but that it is not available to drive the vehicle.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mark aka: Silverback, WS6 TA, JYDog, 83 Crossfire TA, mpikas, mmp...
|
|
|
Naked Raygun
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 339
Location: Southside Chicago
|
The TBO344 in the auto t-bird is the same as the one in the XR4Ti right? I need to know soon because I'm looking to buy (i already have an XR4ti one)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1988 LX: Art Carr AOD + bolt ons
1989 GT: 306ci 3.55s, 1.7rrs, slight head work, 5.12 compcam, 10:5:1 pistons, king cobra clutch, a/c delete, 12* timing, K&N cone..and ugly as hell
|
|
|
Silverback
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1287
Location: DC Metro
|
no they are different sizes, but they do physically interchange
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mark aka: Silverback, WS6 TA, JYDog, 83 Crossfire TA, mpikas, mmp...
|
|
|
Naked Raygun
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 339
Location: Southside Chicago
|
Originally posted by silverback no they are different sizes, but they do physically interchange Have any for sale?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1988 LX: Art Carr AOD + bolt ons
1989 GT: 306ci 3.55s, 1.7rrs, slight head work, 5.12 compcam, 10:5:1 pistons, king cobra clutch, a/c delete, 12* timing, K&N cone..and ugly as hell
|
|
|
Silverback
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1287
Location: DC Metro
|
Well, no not for a while, and for that matter, don’t you think it’s kinda inappropriate to post this in an informational sticky on the board?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mark aka: Silverback, WS6 TA, JYDog, 83 Crossfire TA, mpikas, mmp...
|
|
|
PSIMEANSTANG
Non Seller
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 1
Location:
0
|
Originally posted by gt coupe ok here it goes i have a 90 5.05spd coupe that i want to turbo i also have a 7.3 powerstroke out of my wrecker [changed to gas motor after 3rd zf tranny an 5th 900$ fly wheel i have a tubing bender not mandrel is it doable or not thanks I just got the same flyweel for my 7.3 f250 right at $900 man it sucks. I thought man $900 I could have them new mustang parts with that much money...lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
89.5 GT 71k miles mac headers 2.5 flowmaster all the way, cobra R wheels, AOD TO T-5 swap. king cobra clutch.
90 coupe project car 4" hood ex 4 banger
89.5 lx parts car t-5, 5.0 80k miles for coupe project , will part out as well
parts: dart sr. heads new valve job O-ringed, new 1.6 roller rockers, isky rr-284/294 roller cam 544/573 lift , vortec mass air 80mm, fms 30lbs inj., strut tower brace, 2" lowering springs, 3:73 gears.
parts needed: tb, .30 or over pistons for 2.02 valve dish maybe, #42 lbs inj or trade 30's, msd or like, JY turbos 2-svo or 85-86 t-bird turbos, IC t-birds or to fit. plumbing to fit twin turbo set-up.fms drivshaft,
|
|
|
mustangless
Classified Viewers
Offline
Posts: 262
Location:
|
I got a few questions about the turbos, I have been reading for 3 days but still am not sure. Is there any advantages of going twin turbo over single? Also how do you tell how fast it is going to make power? Is the lower the a/r the faster it makes boost? Would to low of an a/r be bad?
I have read that turbomustangs.com website but I am still confused about a/r.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 12, 2005, 06:23:14 AM by mustangless »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
linkmustang
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 1751
Location: arlington va
|
hey i have a 92 mustang gt 5.0 with 158573 miles 5 speed and all stock
and wont to twin turbo it what would be two good but cheap and reliably turbos for my car
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DWLSRx8
Newbie
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 7
Location:
0
|
hey im looking having an issue in determining turbo size fora tt setup efi stang... Would it be better to run the 60 trims from the FORD T-Bird 85-86 2.3L (Manual) GAR (AiR) TB03 60 trim (watercooled)[/red] or go find some 57 trims from a semi wrecking yard??? Thanks for any input.. ~skottie b...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Wanted Mustang parts for EFI conversion, V-8 Suspention and black interior. When I die bury my ass up, So all those who hate me can kiss my ass...
|
|
|
Aceman85turbo
Non Seller
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 2
Location:
0
|
Originally posted by linkmustang hey i have a 92 mustang gt 5.0 with 158573 miles 5 speed and all stock
and wont to twin turbo it what would be two good but cheap and reliably turbos for my car welcome to the wonderful world of cars... where cheap and reliable are generally not used anywhere near each other.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TripleBlackVert
T44
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 136
Location:
0
|
time to refresh the pics on this thread? none of them show up, at least not for me ...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Black 1995 Mustang GT convertible.
|
|
|
Six_Shooter
T28
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 121
Location:
0
|
Just wanted to make a correction to the original list. The Pontiac Sunbird used the T2 for the 1.8L only, but in '87 when it was changed to a 2.0L the turbo was changed to a T25. 45 comp trim and .48 A/R turbine is not coming to me, but is a .49 A/R. I'll have to dig one out that I have and check it again. It was definatly a T25 though. This turbo was considered even undersized for the engine it came on. Same goes for the T25 that was on the TGP (.60 A/R 60 trim and .69 IIRC), grossly undersized. I've also found the 60trim T-bird T3 to be too small for anything above 7 PSI on a 3.2L, and the map confirms this, actually I think it was 6 PSI and it was pretty much maxed out, on a GM 660 with OEM aluminium heads. I could use two of them on the 3.2L for 10 PSI and be within the max efficiancy, according to the map. What about a stock external wastegate list? IIRC Audi and Porsche both used external gates at some point. I'd also like to see an actual "single turbo" list as well, but I will be using the large turbo on a small 3.1L engine. 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 08, 2005, 06:54:05 AM by Six_Shooter »
|
Logged
|
My Mirror doesn't have a zoom feature.
|
|
|
buickdav
Non Seller
Non Seller
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 70
Location: NW Kansas
0
|
Question deleted by me.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 30, 2005, 06:56:28 PM by buickdav »
|
Logged
|
Dave Burns Midwest Buick Mafia 67', Buick GS
|
|
|
Grant086
Classified Viewers
Offline
Posts: 246
Location: garden city, michigan
|
which turbos have the t3 flange to them, and are there different types of t3 flanges?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Grant086
Classified Viewers
Offline
Posts: 246
Location: garden city, michigan
|
which turbos have the t3 flange to them, and are there different types of t3 flanges?
anybody?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
87vert
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 542
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
|
which turbos have the t3 flange to them, and are there different types of t3 flanges?
garret or airresearch t3's almost anything you find in a junkyard will be a t3 unless its off some sorta diesel truck or something that isnt normally found in a junkyard
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Twin .42/.48 50trim T3's ----SOLD GT40 Heads, Performer intake, 42lb injectors. MegaSquirt EFI, Stock AOD trans 385/465@11psi Resident Megasquirt Expert
|
|
|
reefbluelx
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 39
Location:
|
Will a single Garret T04E 57 trim .70 A/R compressor and P trim turbine support a stock 5.0 with 8psi of boost?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blademasterii
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 2
Location:
|
I could not get a calculator that would work, so I thought I would just ask. I was given two 38 mm turbos off of new volkswagen deisels. Is it possible to make a little power with them or am I just going to be adding a lot of heat to my induction without any power gain. Im not out any money for trying them, but if they just wont make any power at all i'll trade them out for a couple of eclipse turbos.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Black1987stang
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 1
Location:
|
Hey, quick question for you guys...I have a turbo from a Cummins, 5.9L?? its a Holset WH1c can i use this for a single turbo project? will it be too big or maybe to small? I have a 306 with forged pistons, windsor jr heads, gt40 intake, etc. i need to know if i should just ebay it or not then i can start making up flanges for it...Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JeffroBurrdizzleGT
Non Seller
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 3
Location: Dover NH WOHO!
|
which of the above list would provide the most boost? I have a 94 GT i'm looking to do a Twin Turbo setup.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mr.Wolf
Non Seller
Offline
Posts: 1
Location:
|
Hey all. Nice site I have a quick question. I have a 90 F150 XLT, with the v8 5.0 like many mustangs...I have 2 spare 9b turbos off my Mitsubishi 3000gt. Would it be worth putting them on? Also, whats the compression ratio on these motors? Thanks for any help.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TexasTwins
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 342
Location: FOB Sykes/ Badoosh
|
What about the single turbo Nissan 300ZX from the 80's?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
shaku maku
|
|
|
ocshaman
Slow
Classified Viewers
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 612
Location: Mito, Japan
0
|
Jeffro, read up, boost doesn`t matter, amount of air does. LIke Waterpog said a long time ago, it`s like saying a milk farm roduces feces. It`s the milk that`s important(volume of air, CFM) that`s important, not the shit(boost). Boost is just the easiest way to measure the amount of air that is being put out, or rather, the restriction of the amount of air being put out. 10 PSI isn`t 10 PSI. Mr, Wolf, If they aren`t really big enough for a 3 liter engine, why would they work on a 5 liter engine? 4, maybe, but if the 3SI guys swap to 14bs, I don`t think that the 9b`s would do much for a stang. Maybe try them on your lawn mower. Texas Twins, yes, but they are inefficient above 10 PSI, IF you got them cheap or free, sure, but check out the Z31 boards and see what they are doing with the turbos before you go and buy one. I think that the Ford or other turbos from the 2.5 to 3 liter engines would do you better than the Z31 turbos.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1999 Daihatsu Move 660cc's + Turbo = Still SLOW!
Good judgment comes from experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgment.
|
|
|
|
|